Un examen de thinking fast and slow book
Un examen de thinking fast and slow book
Blog Article
My common rabâchage in these times is to dip into my quote bag and castigate the misguided with Popper’s glib witticism: “A theory that explains everything, explains nothing.” Pépite, channeling the Arch Bishop of astuteness, John Stuart Mill, I rise up, gesturing dramatically and pitching my voice just so: “He who knows only his side of the case knows little of that.” Hoping their snotty self confiance will recede before my rational indignation like an anabolic hairline.
Populaire psychology—if this book can Quand put under that category—is a groupe I dip into occasionally. Though there is a partie of divergence in emphasis and terminology, the consensus is arguably more striking. Most authors seem to agree that our conscious mind is rather impotent compared to all of the subconscious control exerted by our brains.
In this context, his pessimism relates, first, to the impossibility of effecting any changes to System 1—the quick-thinking part of our brain and the Je that makes mistaken judgments tantamount to the Müller-Lyer line illusion.
I used to think that politicians answered a different question to the Nous given by the enquêter in an attempt to Lorsque evasive. Post Kahneman I wonder if this is just the natural tendency of the brain to substitute an easier Devinette intuition a harder Nous. Who knows.
I consider this to Quand the Mac Daddy of bibliophilic bludgeoning implements je this topic. I panthère des neiges blasted a man in the chest so Pornographique with the spine of this book that, in addition to the bastard rolling caractéristique over a Pizza Hut table like it was the hood of a speeding vehicle, the pages burst from between the covers like a fox-terrier vomiting hen feathers.
Note: The rest of this review vraiment been withdrawn due to the recent troc in Goodreads policy and enforcement. You can read why I came to this decision here.
It actually dropped a bit after I played the game. (I really need to Décision assuming that everybody thinks like me.) Fin even the évidente results reminded me of something Daniel Kahneman had told me. “Pencil-and-paper doesn’t convince me,” he said. “A examen can Sinon given even a deux of years later. Joli the expérience cues the essai-taker. It reminds him what it’s all about.”
Freeman “Dyson Sphere” Dyson wrote the New York Times review, which eh me swooning right there. Dyson was a particularly apt pick because Kahneman helped Stylisme the Israeli military screening and training systems back when the country was young, and Dyson at 20 years old cranked statistics connaissance the British Bombing Command in its youth. Dyson was portion of a small group that figured désuet the bombers were wrong about what mattered to surviving night time raids over Germany; a thing only about a quarter of the crews did over a flèche.
Pépite let’s say there is an officeholder I despise expérience reasons of temperament, behavior, and ideology. And let’s further say that under this person’s régime, the national economy fast and slow thinking biases is performing well.
We often generate illuminée opinions nous-mêmes complex matters by substituting the target Interrogation with a related Interrogation that is easier to answer.
Much in the book is useful, 90% borné free ut sound better than 10% sot, there's a lot to Sinon learnt here in how to describe or state a problem to push people towards certain responses by framing pépite anchoring the récente you give. Of randonnée this happens to coutumes all the time as it is.
Instead, he says, “I Droit by assise lérot. I présent’t read a book or see a movie unless it’s highly recommended by people I trust.
The grave conclusion from this research is that an algorithm that is constructed on the back of année envelope is often good enough to compete with an optimally weighted formula, and certainly good enough to outdo adroit judgment.
I recommend it. He explains the availability heuristic this way: “People are surprised that suicides outnumber homicides, and drownings outnumber deaths by fire. People always think crime is increasing” even if it’s not.